<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hot Chicks with Douchebags</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rupturedstructure.com/2007/06/01/hot-chicks-with-douchebags/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rupturedstructure.com/2007/06/01/hot-chicks-with-douchebags/</link>
	<description>Shouldn't you be doing something else?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 05:38:23 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Todd</title>
		<link>http://www.rupturedstructure.com/2007/06/01/hot-chicks-with-douchebags/#comment-29</link>
		<dc:creator>Todd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jun 2007 18:48:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rupturedstructure.com/2007/06/01/hot-chicks-with-douchebags/#comment-29</guid>
		<description>OK, by way of clarification, I suppose from the point of view of a 40-50 year-old male who hasn&#039;t had any strange in awhile, they&#039;re all at least semi-hittable, but I didn&#039;t see many that would qualify for the standout category of  &quot;hot.&quot; I guess that makes it a semantic issue, huh?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK, by way of clarification, I suppose from the point of view of a 40-50 year-old male who hasn&#8217;t had any strange in awhile, they&#8217;re all at least semi-hittable, but I didn&#8217;t see many that would qualify for the standout category of  &#8220;hot.&#8221; I guess that makes it a semantic issue, huh?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: effigy</title>
		<link>http://www.rupturedstructure.com/2007/06/01/hot-chicks-with-douchebags/#comment-28</link>
		<dc:creator>effigy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jun 2007 17:24:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rupturedstructure.com/2007/06/01/hot-chicks-with-douchebags/#comment-28</guid>
		<description>[i]but seems perfectly content to stretch the definition of “hot chick.”[/i]

which one?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[i]but seems perfectly content to stretch the definition of “hot chick.”[/i]</p>
<p>which one?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
